Eh?

Sep. 2nd, 2006 10:39 pm
syredronning: (Default)
[personal profile] syredronning
Someone makes a mood theme and calls it Women of Startrek and there is not a single TOS woman inside?

Of course, it's everyone artistic decision, but...duh.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] watergal.livejournal.com
Erp? Yes, I agree, problem for me at least.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-03 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] syredronning.livejournal.com
Yeah, my thought. And nice lesbian luv icon!)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's annoying, but somehow also not surprising. Meh.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-03 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] syredronning.livejournal.com
I know what you mean. I'm sure they would have fallen out of the color scheme a bit (though one can do a lot of tweaking in graphics programs), but it's somehow not right in my eyes.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-03 06:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lemonrocket.livejournal.com
That's the same guy who posted some Women of Trek icons the other day. He included Uhura and Elizabeth Dehner there (but no Chapel or Number One or any other TOS gals), so it's weird he didn't include them in the mood theme. And a shame, too!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-03 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] syredronning.livejournal.com
Weird indeed.

But hey, cool icon!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-03 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tlin-s.livejournal.com
They've done a great job matching mood to picture, but it's just not right (IMHO) not to include the lovely ladies that started it all.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-03 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] syredronning.livejournal.com
Yeah, it's like a weird kind of discrimination, somehow...sigh.

Profile

syredronning: (Default)
syredronning

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags